Which measure is NOT typically used to track clinical documentation improvement (CDI) programs?

The record agreement rate is not typically used to track clinical documentation improvement (CDI) programs because it focuses on the consistency or accuracy of data within the patient records rather than directly measuring the outcomes of the improvement initiatives themselves. CDI programs primarily aim to enhance the quality of clinical documentation, ensuring that it accurately reflects the patient’s condition and care.

In contrast, other measures such as record review rate, query agreement rate, and physician query rate are more aligned with the objectives of CDI programs. The record review rate assesses how frequently patient records are evaluated for documentation quality, reflecting the program's engagement and operational effectiveness. The query agreement rate measures the extent to which physicians agree with the queries raised by CDI specialists, indicating how well the documentation aligns with clinical realities. The physician query rate evaluates the number of queries generated per physician, which helps monitor active participation in CDI efforts and the response to documentation gaps.

Focusing on these more relevant metrics allows organizations to effectively gauge progress and areas needing improvement in their CDI initiatives.